Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rjt"
(New page: Hello Richard, I remember your [http://www.nabble.com/Broken-abstraction-for-RelLib-and-GrampsDb-t3157777.html plan] for a Certificate Manager application ! I would like to see something ...) |
m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello Richard, I remember your [http://www.nabble.com/Broken-abstraction-for-RelLib-and-GrampsDb-t3157777.html plan] for a Certificate Manager application ! | Hello Richard, I remember your [http://www.nabble.com/Broken-abstraction-for-RelLib-and-GrampsDb-t3157777.html plan] for a Certificate Manager application ! | ||
− | I would like to see something like that but as I am not a 'python wizard', I just made some contributions for a better sources management ... see [ | + | I would like to see something like that but as I am not a 'python wizard', I just made some contributions for a better sources management ... see [[Addon:RepositoriesReport|Repository Report]] and RepoRef quick report on Gramps-3.1.2. |
Also, I was able to use a third party program as a certificate manager working together with Gramps ! | Also, I was able to use a third party program as a certificate manager working together with Gramps ! | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
-- [[user:Romjerome|Jerome R.]] | -- [[user:Romjerome|Jerome R.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | :[[RepositoriesReport|Alternate Repository Report]] is not really standard, I cheated to get lists faster... and is only working for Gramps-3.1.x. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :For me, there is two place where Gramps management was not very clear. Source management is one of them (rather a gedcom support issue ...) : source reference (Volume/Page, date) like used on Gramps-2.0.x (before repository support) can be used on multiple object (Person with source, Event with source, Attribute with source, etc ...). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :It is a nightmare to find a way for dispalying this source references. I generated an [http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=2831 alternate filter on event], but it is not a good solution for all objects with source. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :We should not ignore this data even database design does not allow to easily use it. I thought on using [http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=3105 Matches filters] on primary objects, but I do not know how to retrieve this data for secondary objects or addresses :( | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Note: [[Recording_French_Census_data|recording a french census]] is not far away from [[Recording_UK_Census_data|recording UK census]]. But seems there is two type of management. Source reference (volume/page) could be used on books, french archives are often available "on-line", most part of time, searcher cannot easily access to books ... Looks like a gedcom 5.5 issue, which has been written 10 years ago and ignores internet, scanned and translated certificates ! | ||
+ | |||
+ | :-- [[user:Romjerome|romjerome]] |
Latest revision as of 22:34, 30 January 2022
Hello Richard, I remember your plan for a Certificate Manager application !
I would like to see something like that but as I am not a 'python wizard', I just made some contributions for a better sources management ... see Repository Report and RepoRef quick report on Gramps-3.1.2.
Also, I was able to use a third party program as a certificate manager working together with Gramps ! See Tellico.
-- Jerome R.
- Alternate Repository Report is not really standard, I cheated to get lists faster... and is only working for Gramps-3.1.x.
- For me, there is two place where Gramps management was not very clear. Source management is one of them (rather a gedcom support issue ...) : source reference (Volume/Page, date) like used on Gramps-2.0.x (before repository support) can be used on multiple object (Person with source, Event with source, Attribute with source, etc ...).
- It is a nightmare to find a way for dispalying this source references. I generated an alternate filter on event, but it is not a good solution for all objects with source.
- We should not ignore this data even database design does not allow to easily use it. I thought on using Matches filters on primary objects, but I do not know how to retrieve this data for secondary objects or addresses :(
- Note: recording a french census is not far away from recording UK census. But seems there is two type of management. Source reference (volume/page) could be used on books, french archives are often available "on-line", most part of time, searcher cannot easily access to books ... Looks like a gedcom 5.5 issue, which has been written 10 years ago and ignores internet, scanned and translated certificates !
- -- romjerome