Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:GaryGriffin

294 bytes added, 17:18, 4 October 2020
dna feedback from matt
:[[User talk:GaryGriffin|talk]]) 17:11, 29 Sep 2020 (PST)
::[[User:GaryGriffin|GaryGriffin]]: No, I don't think that transparency is a solution. Unfortunately I don't know what would be the best way to implement it. I'm afraid you can only try it that way and then try other solutions if it isn't working well. Maybe it would be more efficent to try to create it as a view or report (which calulates it once for <s>two </s> the selected persons) instead of a gramplet (which calculates it every time you change a person or switch to another active person)?
::[[User:Matt|Matt]] ([[User talk:Matt|talk]]) 14:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
:::[[User:Matt|Matt]]: If you wanted just the view of one other person, you can run SyncAssociation to copy the Note from the first person to the associated person (if it is not already there) and then switch to the associated person and run the DNA gramplet. That would (probably) only have one pair of people in the view. I assumed that the value of this gramplet was when there were many associated people to look at the big picture. I thought that there would be only a small number (often just one) of people with very long Associated lists. Looking at the reciprocal view would be a way to reveal overlaps. But I didnt think that would actually be interesting normally.:::[[User talk:GaryGriffin|talk]]) 09:42, 04 Oct 2020 (PST) ::::[[User:GaryGriffin|GaryGriffin]]: Sorry that was a typo, I meant "which calulates it once for <s>two</s> the selected persons", so still all matches drawn for users to look at the big picture. :):::: [[User:Matt|Matt]] ([[User talk:Matt|talk]]) 17:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Navigation menu