User talk:Shura - Revision history

Dm1407: /* Linux Genealogy CD */ this is why :)

2009-07-15T08:10:47Z

‎Linux Genealogy CD: this is why :)

Dm1407: /* old links */ any plans on updating live cd

2009-07-15T07:01:55Z

‎old links: any plans on updating live cd

Bmcage: old links

2007-03-07T19:09:29Z

old links

Bmcage at 22:06, 6 March 2007

2007-03-06T22:06:45Z

Bmcage: poll on devel portal

2007-03-06T19:58:13Z

poll on devel portal

New page

== poll on devel portal ==

Alex,
I added poll on devel portal. Let me know if ok. Also, are three boxes under it too much or not?

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Do you have any plans to update the [[Talk:Linux_Genealogy_CD|Live CD]]?
-Maybe add java, so other Free software can go on Live CD?
+Maybe add java, so other Free software can go on Live CD?  ( See the following news about Ubuntu 9.04 and Java [http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-9-04-Receives-OpenJDK-6-Certification-116630.shtml] )
 Thank you
 [[User:Dm1407|Dm1407]] 07:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 15 July 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	They refer to database api, but I have not used that page yet, nor written a relcalc.		They refer to database api, but I have not used that page yet, nor written a relcalc.
		+
		+	==Linux Genealogy CD==
		+
		+	Hi Alex,
		+
		+	Do you have any plans to update the [[Talk:Linux_Genealogy_CD\|Live CD]]?
		+
		+	Maybe add java, so other Free software can go on Live CD?
		+
		+	Thank you
		+	[[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 07:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 7 March 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Please have a look at the code in [[Poll]] and [[News]] if the inclusion is clear to you, as I think you or Don will make new polls or news. The intention should be to move items out of the inclusion area denoted by <nowiki><section ...></nowiki> as they grow old, but leave them on the original page for archive reasons.		Please have a look at the code in [[Poll]] and [[News]] if the inclusion is clear to you, as I think you or Don will make new polls or news. The intention should be to move items out of the inclusion area denoted by <nowiki><section ...></nowiki> as they grow old, but leave them on the original page for archive reasons.
		+
		+	== old links ==
		+
		+	Alex, old links on http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Relationship_Calculator
		+
		+	They refer to database api, but I have not used that page yet, nor written a relcalc.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 6 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Alex,		Alex,
	I added poll on devel portal. Let me know if ok. Also, are three boxes under it too much or not?		I added poll on devel portal. Let me know if ok. Also, are three boxes under it too much or not?
		+
		+	Ok, I've put it on developers now as it offers feedback to the development.
		+
		+	There are some points with the polls:
		+
		+	* size is varying depending on the question. Therefore, it should be placed next to a box for which this is no problem, eg categories list
		+	* it cannot be translated. Actually, the poll is an ugly hack i think, the question is the key in an sql table, so a question in dutch is a different poll (I tried some approaches to circumvent this, but they failed. Php hacking is needed, but the creators have no contact page :-( ). Therefore, I think the poll is not suitable on the main page or genealogy page which I intend to translate. It might eat a lot of resources too the developer says.
		+	* the poll should be where people actually see it. Will the community page attrack traffic?
		+
		+	I suggest the following:
		+	* the poll is actually in the [[Poll]] page, so we include it on community page and on developers page, so it has more possible visibility. On the community site a link to old polls is also offered.
		+	* when a new poll is made on [[Poll]], we announce it with the News section on the main page, with link to the community site. Like this, we increase the visibility to people only coming to the main page.
		+
		+	Please have a look at the code in [[Poll]] and [[News]] if the inclusion is clear to you, as I think you or Don will make new polls or news. The intention should be to move items out of the inclusion area denoted by <nowiki><section ...></nowiki> as they grow old, but leave them on the original page for archive reasons.