Talk:Portal:Developers - Revision history

Patsyblefebre: old

2012-12-28T22:55:12Z

old

Romjerome: Reverted edits by Bilin (talk) to last revision by Nickw

2011-09-14T07:46:01Z

Reverted edits by Bilin (talk) to last revision by Nickw

Bilin: /* The GHD */ new section

2011-09-14T04:09:32Z

‎The GHD: new section

Nickw at 05:37, 17 April 2010

2010-04-17T05:37:57Z

Dm1407: Why is the menu under the article?

2009-02-09T13:32:05Z

Why is the menu under the article?

Zfoldvari at 22:25, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T22:25:02Z

Bmcage: /* Page rearrangement */

2007-09-21T20:08:01Z

‎Page rearrangement

Zfoldvari at 17:48, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T17:48:55Z

Bmcage at 09:50, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T09:50:55Z

Zfoldvari: Page rearrangement

2007-09-20T20:07:41Z

Page rearrangement

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 28 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~==Below the partero==~~
−	~~below the partero I see an inputfield an then 5 messages listed but I do not know how to get to them~~

−	~~Text only mentions hit <enter>~~
−
−	~~:Erik, that is all there is. You can type a short message and hit enter. We are limited by the poll plugin tool we use. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 09:39, 4 April 2007 (EDT)~~
−
−	~~== sub-categories ==~~
−
−	~~I add existing sub-categories on [[:Category:Developers/General]].~~
−	~~Maybe wiki should add other "devel" pages/sub-categories on this pages for having an other index list (less texts, just hyperlinks) ...~~
−
−	~~== Page rearrangement ==~~
−
−	~~I propose to:~~
−	* Remove the categories from the [[Template:Developers/Intro]] box, as I have already noted in the [[Template_talk:Developers/Intro\|discussion]] of the template.
−	~~::Done [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)~~
−	* remove the [[Poll]]. It is enough on the [[Portal:Community]] page, or it might get a place on the main page too. Developers of the software are not necessarily developers of the site as well.
−	::Community does not get so much trafic as it is a static page. Main page is no option as the poll cannot be translated. The old site had poll on the main page, I would vote to leave it here. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
−	* move the [[Template:Developers/Categories]] box on the bottom of the page, under all other boxes, in a separate row.
−	~~([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 16:07, 20 September 2007 (EDT))~~
−	::If I remove the Poll yes, otherwise I personally like to have them on the screen when it opens. I tend to navigate to the categories. Somebody added the bottom three boxes without links. Furthermore they are not well aligned.... What to do with them? Changed the layout a bit, revert if not ok or feel free to move poll further down. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
−
−	~~:::So where do the users go most often? My argument is that there could be a few hundreds of users (271 registerred), of which only 5-10 are developers.~~
−	:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))
−	::::Feel free to try. This html style table placement really isn't my forte. We can always roll back in case of problems. The best is probably to lift the poll out of the page indeed, and direct people to the poll page more prominently if we find poll important. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 16:08, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
−	:::::Done. Alignment is better now (I hope). I think you still get the categories on the sceen. I left the poll, please move it as you wish. The empty boxes are still there, only commented out. ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 18:25, 21 September 2007 (EDT))
−
−	~~==Menu==~~
−	~~Why is the menu under the article? Can someone more knowledgeable work it out? Thank you [[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 14 September 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Menu==		==Menu==
	Why is the menu under the article? Can someone more knowledgeable work it out? Thank you [[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		Why is the menu under the article? Can someone more knowledgeable work it out? Thank you [[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
−
−	~~== The GHD ==~~
−
−	~~Spring is right here with all dynamics starting anew. this really may be the time for~~
−	~~you personally to evaluate and rejuvenate your http://www.thesunglassescheap.com/ wardrobe and coordinate your jewelry. in no way~~
−	~~discard diamond jewelry when you need to do http://www.monclersbaratoonline.com/ clothing. types come, go, but sooner or later on~~
−	return. choose diamond jewelry types that flatter you even though they are not the existing style fad. The subsequent few of years will almost undoubtedly have a really style fad that could maybe be flattering to you.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 14 September 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Menu==		==Menu==
	Why is the menu under the article? Can someone more knowledgeable work it out? Thank you [[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		Why is the menu under the article? Can someone more knowledgeable work it out? Thank you [[User:Dm1407\|Dm1407]] 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== The GHD ==
		+
		+	Spring is right here with all dynamics starting anew. this really may be the time for
		+	you personally to evaluate and rejuvenate your http://www.thesunglassescheap.com/ wardrobe and coordinate your jewelry. in no way
		+	discard diamond jewelry when you need to do http://www.monclersbaratoonline.com/ clothing. types come, go, but sooner or later on
		+	return. choose diamond jewelry types that flatter you even though they are not the existing style fad. The subsequent few of years will almost undoubtedly have a really style fad that could maybe be flattering to you.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 I propose to:
-* remove the categories from the [[Template:Developers/Intro]] box, as I have already noted in the [[Template_talk:Developers/Intro|discussion]] of the template.
+* Remove the categories from the [[Template:Developers/Intro]] box, as I have already noted in the [[Template_talk:Developers/Intro|discussion]] of the template.
 ::Done [[User:Bmcage|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
 * remove the [[Poll]]. It is enough on the [[Portal:Community]] page, or it might get a place on the main page too. Developers of the software are not necessarily developers of the site as well.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 below the partero I see an inputfield an then 5 messages listed but I do not know how to get to them
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 ::::Feel free to try. This html style table placement really isn't my forte. We can always roll back in case of problems. The best is probably to lift the poll out of the page indeed, and direct people to the poll page more prominently if we find poll important. [[User:Bmcage|bmcage]] 16:08, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
 :::::Done. Alignment is better now (I hope). I think you still get the categories on the sceen. I left the poll, please move it as you wish. The empty boxes are still there, only commented out. ([[User:Zfoldvari|Zfoldvari]] 18:25, 21 September 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 21 September 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))		:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))
	::::Feel free to try. This html style table placement really isn't my forte. We can always roll back in case of problems. The best is probably to lift the poll out of the page indeed, and direct people to the poll page more prominently if we find poll important. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 16:08, 21 September 2007 (EDT)		::::Feel free to try. This html style table placement really isn't my forte. We can always roll back in case of problems. The best is probably to lift the poll out of the page indeed, and direct people to the poll page more prominently if we find poll important. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 16:08, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
		+	:::::Done. Alignment is better now (I hope). I think you still get the categories on the sceen. I left the poll, please move it as you wish. The empty boxes are still there, only commented out. ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 18:25, 21 September 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 21 September 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:::So where do the users go most often? My argument is that there could be a few hundreds of users (271 registerred), of which only 5-10 are developers.		:::So where do the users go most often? My argument is that there could be a few hundreds of users (271 registerred), of which only 5-10 are developers.
	:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))		:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))
		+	::::Feel free to try. This html style table placement really isn't my forte. We can always roll back in case of problems. The best is probably to lift the poll out of the page indeed, and direct people to the poll page more prominently if we find poll important. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 16:08, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 21 September 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 16:07, 20 September 2007 (EDT))		([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 16:07, 20 September 2007 (EDT))
	::If I remove the Poll yes, otherwise I personally like to have them on the screen when it opens. I tend to navigate to the categories. Somebody added the bottom three boxes without links. Furthermore they are not well aligned.... What to do with them? Changed the layout a bit, revert if not ok or feel free to move poll further down. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)		::If I remove the Poll yes, otherwise I personally like to have them on the screen when it opens. I tend to navigate to the categories. Somebody added the bottom three boxes without links. Furthermore they are not well aligned.... What to do with them? Changed the layout a bit, revert if not ok or feel free to move poll further down. [[User:Bmcage\|bmcage]] 05:50, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::So where do the users go most often? My argument is that there could be a few hundreds of users (271 registerred), of which only 5-10 are developers.
		+	:::I don't think either that the empty boxes make any sense. Also agree that alignment should be improved. I thought this: if instead of the templates the table cells were defined with border, all the rows would have the same height. What do you think? ([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 13:48, 21 September 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 20 September 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	I add existing sub-categories on [[:Category:Developers/General]].		I add existing sub-categories on [[:Category:Developers/General]].
	Maybe wiki should add other "devel" pages/sub-categories on this pages for having an other index list (less texts, just hyperlinks) ...		Maybe wiki should add other "devel" pages/sub-categories on this pages for having an other index list (less texts, just hyperlinks) ...
		+
		+	== Page rearrangement ==
		+
		+	I propose to:
		+	* remove the categories from the [[Template:Developers/Intro]] box, as I have already noted in the [[Template_talk:Developers/Intro\|discussion]] of the template.
		+	* remove the [[Poll]]. It is enough on the [[Portal:Community]] page, or it might get a place on the main page too. Developers of the software are not necessarily developers of the site as well.
		+	* move the [[Template:Developers/Categories]] box on the bottom of the page, under all other boxes, in a separate row.
		+	([[User:Zfoldvari\|Zfoldvari]] 16:07, 20 September 2007 (EDT))